The New News
by Ken Parish Perkins
"They are so engrossed in all this," she says. "They have totally
different flight patterns surrounding digital usage. We're the
immigrants who are popping into the digital world midway through
life. When we make judgments of what will be appealing to these
populations, we're wrong most of the time. They're working at the
ground level. They know what they want, where it's going. They know
the ticker thing was bothering them. And they were going to find
the solution."
Of course, not everyone is so sure that the solution of
interactivity is better, even right here at Ball State. While Steve
Bell, a professor at Ball State and the longtime
ABC anchor who
filed the first live satellite report from
Vietnam, applauds
interactivity ("It's just another media revolution I'll have to
live through," he quips), he has his concerns.
"If you're not careful, the audience will set the whole agenda," he
warns. "People are only getting what they want. Well, you don't go
to the doctor to only hear what you want. You don't go to a lawyer
to only hear what you want. The role of the journalist has always
been to not only provide people what they want and need but provide
people with what they didn't know they wanted. But you, as the
professional, determine they do need to know about it. And if you
present it in the right way, they will come to know and appreciate
this editorial service you're providing for them."
To others, like Mark Glaser, who writes extensively about how the
Internet affects media, the biggest shift can be seen in the
mind-set of the journalist.
Share Your Comments