China is shaking off the rust from the
old Iron Curtain days and moving foward with the world's most
ambitious Industrial Revolution-ever.
In the 1970's Merrill Weingrod spent a lot of time in Taiwan.
Then the owner of a Massachusetts-based leather-goods company,
Weingrod could see that a lot of manufacturing in his industry was
moving to lower-cost Asia; to stay competitive, he would trek to
Taiwan to forge alliances and visit partner factories. Each time he
visited Taipei, the capital, he was struck by the frenzied pace.
"You'd get up at five in the morning and go out in the street, and
it would be completely full of people running around," says
Weingrod, who is now CEO at China Strategies, a consultancy with
offices in Providence, Rhode Island, and Shanghai that advises
companies looking to do business in China. "It was the most
hyperkinetic, frantic, entrepreneurial-driven place you could
imagine." When he would socialize with his Taiwanese counterparts,
the same question kept popping up. "If it's this insane in Taiwan
with 20 million people, what is going to happen when China opens
up?" says Weingrod. "The Taiwanese would just look at you and
smile."
Obviously, Weingrod's colleagues in
Taiwan - which China still
claims as one of its provinces, despite the fact that it has
operated autonomously since 1949 - knew something about the
economic potential of its mammoth Communist neighbor. But they
probably never could have guessed that China would become the
economic behemoth it is today. Indeed, since launching major
economic reforms in 1978, this country of 1.3 billion people has
undergone a dramatic revolution, moving from a centrally planned,
largely agrarian economy to one that is largely capitalist,
industrialized, and increasingly sophisticated.
And it has happened in the relative blink of the eye. In less than
three decades, China has accomplished as much, and in some ways far
more, in terms of transforming its rural, agriculturally based
economy, than the
United States did in twice the time, at least by
some estimates. Historical comparisons are tricky, though,
particularly considering the times in which each economic
revolution took place; the United States was relatively early to
industrialize, with industrial progress often coming hand in hand
with new inventions in manufacturing, while China's tardiness has
allowed it to adopt methods and approaches that had already proved
successful.
Not surprisingly, this wholesale transformation has produced
profound changes in the lives of the Chinese and, given the
country's huge population and economic openness, in people all
around the globe as well. Since the beginning of the reforms,
Chinese GDP has grown tenfold, averaging about a 10 percent bump
each year. And, by official estimates, the number of people in
rural poverty has been reduced from 250 million in 1978 to 29
million in 2003. In 2005, China was the world's third-largest
exporter, behind the United States and
Germany, sending more than
$750 billion worth of goods overseas.
With the liberalization of the economy, foreign investment has
poured in - to the tune of more than half a trillion dollars since
1978. Just in Shanghai, the hub of the country's economic activity,
there were 14,400 wholly foreign-owned companies at the end of
2003, as well as 13,000 more underwritten by foreign money. The
proliferation of factories and economic opportunities in the cities
has prompted the largest rural-to-urban migration the world has
ever seen.
The list goes on and on. Yet for all the benefits economic reforms
have brought, there is a daunting list of challenges faced by both
China's
Communist Party policymakers as well as by business and
political leaders around the globe. How, for instance, can China
adequately provide proper housing and infrastructure for the
countless millions moving to their cities? How can they halt and
begin to roll back the terrible environmental damage that has
accompanied their fast development? Around the world, urgent
questions about how to stanch wholesale job losses, prompted by
companies moving operations to China, are being hotly debated.
AN UNLIKELY STORY
There's little doubt that China will be at the center of the
world's attention in this century. But to understand how the
country came to take on such an important global role, one has to
go back to the 1970s and the aftermath of the leadership of China's
authoritarian Communist ruler, Mao Zedong. For almost three
decades, from 1949 until his death in 1976, Mao ruled China as a
dictator, determining the shape and direction of the country's most
important social and economic policies.
From an economic point of view, says David Lampton, dean of
faculty and director of China studies at Johns Hopkins University's
School of Advanced International Studies, Mao's rule was
devastating. "Mao had some accomplishments, but he left a legacy of
economic chaos," he says. In particular, the Great Leap Forward
(the disastrous effort to industrialize China's economy) and the
Cultural Revolution (Mao's attempt to affirm the dominance of his
political ideology) caused widespread famine, death, and
dislocation.
Broke, isolated, and backward, China was not just ready for change
but desperately in need of it by the time Mao died. The impetus for
reform was certainly the dire living conditions of most Chinese.
But also important, says Lampton, was the collective sense that
China could and should be outperforming its neighbors - South
Korea, Taiwan,
Hong Kong, and
Singapore, collectively known as the
East Asian Tigers - who were then in the midst of their own
spectacular economic growth spurts. "It was a sense of Chinese
pride. The characters [spelling out
China in the Chinese
language] mean 'middle kingdom,' halfway between heaven and earth,"
says Lampton. "It's an exalted sense of China's role in the region
and the world. But the reality was it was an extremely poor
country."
China's power vacuum ultimately was filled by Deng Xiaoping, who
had previously risen and then been purged during Mao's rule. Deng
was a far different leader than Mao. Having been educated in
France, he was more worldly and more open to foreign ideas than his
predecessor, who had done little traveling. At the core of Deng's
leadership style was devotion not to ideology but to pragmatism.
Indeed, Deng was fond of an old Chinese saying, one that summed up
his approach to economic reform: "It doesn't matter if the cat is
white or black, as long as it catches the mouse."
"They field-tested their ideas. They would try something in one
place and spread it if it worked and drop it if it didn't," says
William Overholt, director of the Center for
Asia Pacific Policy at
the RAND Corporation, a think tank in
Santa Monica, California.
"They were pragmatic and went with what worked."
What worked, it turned out, was undoing many of the underlying
structures and rules of China's Communist-era economy. Early on,
Deng confronted a cornerstone of Mao's rural policies: the
agricultural communes. During his rule, Mao had forced farmers and
peasants - the vast majority of the population - onto large
collectives in which all the output from the land went into a
central fund. Deng eliminated the communes and gave individual
farmers rights to use parcels of land. Hoping to boost production
and encourage and spur individual enterprise, Deng told farmers
that they could keep whatever they produced, beyond what they owed
the state. The promise of individual gain had a big impact. "China
was probably, at that point, about 85 or 90 percent peasants," says
Lampton. "So he could energize 85 to 90 percent of the population
economically simply by doing away with communes and drawing a link
between, 'You work on this piece of land, and the more you get out
of it, the more you'll keep.' "
A CONTINUING PROCESS
Slowly, through the 1980s to today, China has continued to reform
its economy. In the beginning, China had very little capital to
fund its transformation into an industrial economy, so Deng, ever
cautious, allowed a small amount of foreign investment. "First they
allowed Special Economic Zones near Hong Kong to deal with the
outside world and set up a few state companies to trade and invest
with foreigners," says Overholt, who is also the author of
The
Rise of China. When the first economic zones proved successful,
cities around China clamored for the same opportunity to boost
trade and lure investment. Through homegrown entrepreneurs, joint
ventures with foreign companies, and now wholly foreign-owned
ventures, new manufacturing plants - making everything from shoes
to electronics - have popped up everywhere.
Other important policy initiatives have followed and are ongoing,
including the difficult task of breaking up large, inefficient
state-owned industries and reforming the banking system. But as
important as policy has been in this economic revolution, China has
been aided by other, less-obvious factors. A vitally important one
has been the financial and business expertise the country has been
able to draw upon from legions of overseas Chinese, many of whom
fled the Communist regime, and others who are the ancestors of
people who emigrated during previous troubled times. In places like
Hong Kong and Singapore,
Europe and the United States, the Chinese
diaspora flourished. And when their homeland finally opened back up
to the outside, many were eager to both invest and provide
guidance.
Also important, and very much lacking in other formerly Communist
countries, was a remembrance of how to operate in a capitalist
economy. "This is a big difference between China and the Soviet
Union," Lampton says. "The revolution in
Russia was in 1917, and
so by the time you get to the fall of the
Soviet Union, in 1989,
you are into this revolution 70-plus years. Therefore, in Russia,
there wasn't really anybody left who remembered operating a market
economy. It had been wiped out." In China, on the other hand, where
Mao ruled for less than 30 years, the skills necessary to build
businesses and be entrepreneurial - not to mention to formulate
policies that encouraged these things - were not yet completely
eradicated.
As China continues to grow at such a fast clip, it also has been
helped by its citizens' somewhat remarkable (particularly in
comparison to most Americans) ability to stash away money they
earn. "They have a very high national savings rate," says Robert
Dunn, an economics professor at George Washington University in
Washington, D.C. "That, of course, enables them to invest a
tremendous amount in plant equipment and infrastructure and
whatever they need, because they've got a lot of savings."
Just where all that investment is going has been very much on
display for frequent visitors to China, particularly in Shanghai.
In the 1990s, there was so much construction going on that the city
looked different from month to month. "If you were away for six
months, the city never looked the same," says Weingrod, who travels
often to China. "You couldn't get your bearings based on where you
saw the buildings, because the buildings you remembered from last
time were often blocked out by new ones."
GROWING PAINS
It's not difficult to find people who have legitimate concerns
about China's ascendance. Any U.S. congressman whose district has
seen a factory close down and move operations to lower-cost China
is bound to express concerns about job losses, as are leaders in
other traditionally cheap manufacturing centers, like
Mexico, which
has also lost considerable business to Asia. Worries about
religious and political freedom - after all, the country is still
ruled by the Communist Party, which squelches dissent and views
that it deems threatening - as well as China's willingness to
forcefully assert its claimed sovereignty over Taiwan, are but a
few of many major issues.
But it's not just foreigners who worry about where China is headed
and how its development will progress. The Chinese themselves are
well aware of the challenges they face as they try to continue the
blistering growth; in fact, in their latest five-year plan, the
Chinese set themselves the goal of boosting the nation's gross
domestic product by 45 percent by 2010. "Any American policy-maker
who actually knew what the agenda of China's leaders was in terms
of the problems they face every morning when they get up probably
wouldn't have the courage to get out of bed," says Lampton.
Indeed, the list of challenges is long and daunting. How, for
instance, will China, whose demand for
energy to fuel its growth is
massive, get what it needs? How will the country provide pensions
and health care to a rapidly aging population now that the
Communist-era social safety net is gone? Problems of disparity -
common in market economies -have also surfaced. "The disparity of
income has become very rapidly much more unequal," says Lampton. In
fact, according to Lampton, the per capita GDP of people in rural
areas is $320, while in cities it's over $1,000. There also remains
plenty of poverty in rural and urban areas.
The mass of people flocking to the cities, particularly those on
the
east coast, where investment and development are greatest, is
straining urban areas' abilities to cope. "There are just too many
people, and there isn't enough housing, roads, or infrastructure,"
says Dunn. "It's getting very crowded."
Environmental degradation is an increasing concern as well. "The
environment in China is under stress on every front. It's not
simply a matter of air or water or land - it's everything," says
Elizabeth Economy, Director for Asia Studies at the Council on
Foreign Relations in New York and author of
The River Runs
Black: The Environmental Challenges to China's Future. By
various estimates, China has 16 of the 20 most polluted cities in
the world. According to Economy, the
Chinese government believes
that 400,000 people die each year prematurely as a result of
respiratory diseases related to air pollution. Five of China's
seven major river systems are considered highly polluted, and the
government estimates that 300 million people drink polluted water
each day.
In addition to damaging health and biodiversity, environmental problems take a serious toll on China’s economic plans. In places where lakes and rivers have dried up, factories don’t have the energy necessary to operate. “You can see instances where they have put the brakes on [the economy] at least for periods of time,” says Economy. “There’s an enormous impact on industry, hydropower, and agriculture. Local economies have certainly changed because of what’s going on with the environment.”
Still, despite the many challenges China faces, there are few who believe the country’s economic expansion and reform will be derailed. For the most part, experts say, China has done an amazing job of making the right decisions at the right time. “The fact that their cities function well and their social and geographic groups have improved their condition is a miracle of management,” says Overholt. He actually likens China’s situation to a man being chased by a bear. To him, there’s only one way for China to continue to stay ahead of all its difficult challenges: to keep its economic growth brisk and continue the sometimes difficult process of reform.
“Here’s a guy running fast and being chased by a bear, and so far he’s staying ahead of the bear,” says Overholt. “But he had better keep running and running.”
American AirlinesThere’s no need to take the slow boat to China: American Airlines flies nonstop to Shanghai from Chicago O’Hare, making the roughly 7,000-mile trip on a Boeing 777, our largest and most comfortable aircraft. We hope to see you onboard soon!Author