Don Juan | irritation

Agreeing To Agree

by Jim Shahin
Page:
Image about Shahin Takes Off 03-01-2007
Agreeing to Agree



EVERYTHING WAS as everything always is: On that otherwise ordinary Saturday morning, we were sipping coffee, turning pages of the newspaper. Jessica was reading; I was reading aloud, to her increasing irritation.

Around the third cup of coffee, we took a short break from the paper and were discussing particle physics - even 20 years into our marriage we always enjoy nothing but the most stimulating of conversations - when she said something that would have confounded both Einstein, who knew particle physics, and Don Juan, who knew women.

She said: "I'm not arguing with you."

That sentence was not the confounding part, as I had heard those words before. In married-people language, it generally translates as: "You may think I am arguing with you, but I'm not. I am just letting you know that what you consider an argument, I consider the fundamental right to free speech. Which, as far as I know, has not been repealed, even in this marriage."

But there was something about the way she said the words that gave me pause, as if … as if she actually meant them.

While I was trying to determine if I was overanalyzing her inflections, the tremor of her sentence was followed by a syntactical earthquake. "I've decided," she said, "not to argue with you all day."

My knees buckled. Never in our 151,200 hours of marriage (more, actually, because as I write this, it has been 20 years, seven months, and 21 days - but who's counting?) had I heard anything remotely close to those words.

"You what?"

"I just decided to try it," she said.


Page:



Share Your Comments

ISSUE: Mar 1, 2007
American Way Cover - 3/1/2007