drug development | Novartis | Roche | Franz Humer Yes
Changing Medicine’s Dna
by
Robert Mcgarvey
American Way It's said that right after Novartis
raised its equity stake in Roche to 32.7 percent and triggered
rumors that your company was about to be swallowed up, you went off
for a ski weekend. True?
Franz Humer Yes, I went skiing. [Laughs] But that is really
not the major point. The point behind your question is, where do I
stand on megamergers. I believe megamergers are not a means of
raising the productivity of research. On the contrary, they destroy
much research. And the success of our business is founded on
experimental development. That's why I do not believe megamergers
are the right way forward.
American Way Why do you believe that megamergers
destroy drug development?
Humer Research and drug development are intricate, complex,
interrelated
processes. If you disturb that process, it comes to a halt.
Research is very sensitive, highly intellectual. It needs a lot of
patience. You destroy that when you embark on a megamerger. Things
get focused on internal matters, on who gets what job, on which
project gets carried forward and which gets killed. Researchers
need an environment where their creativity gets maintained and
increased, not where it gets diverted and stifled.
American Way Back to the skiing: Why are you
unconcerned about Novartis' stake in your company?
Humer Because we have a clear shareholding structure. Two
families [the Hoffmanns and Oeris] own a majority of voting shares,
and they have very clearly said they have no intention of
relinquishing that majority, that they firmly believe in the
strategy that the board and management have put forward over the
last few years. They're committed to maintaining the independence
of Roche as one of the world's leading
healthcare companies.
American Way Where do you see healthcare going?
Arguably we're at a place where the biggest changes in medicine in
perhaps 2,000 years are about to occur.
Related Topics:
Print this Article |