energy sources | United States | Stanley Steamer | Henry Ford
Alternative Autos
by
Barry Lynn
Given the secrecy of most automotive companies, it is perhaps not
surprising that direct answers to these questions are rare. But
there is still plenty of good news coming from the automakers'
research divisions.
America's roads these days are literally
humming with dozens of experimental cars powered by alternatives to
the internal combustion engine, fueled by a variety of alternative
energy sources. Indeed, many auto industry leaders now say the end
of the century-long reign of the four-stroke engine is at last in
sight, even for SUVs, buses, and heavy trucks.
This is more than a competition of ideas. For the companies, the
stakes of which new technologies win out will be huge. One reason,
as most everyone in the business of developing new cars keeps
reminding each other, is the health of the environment. But that's
a rather abstract issue. More imperative is that over the next few
years many of the automobile options now seeking to merge into the
fast lane of production will find themselves, like the EV1,
relegated to the garages of enthusiasts and to the floors of
museums.
Past Perfect?
In many senses, the auto industry is returning to its earliest
years a century ago, when the architecture of the car seemed ready
to go in almost any direction. Hundreds of companies experimented
with dozens of vehicle types, fueled by myriad fuels and fuel
mixtures. By 1914, roughly a third of the cars in the United States
ran off electric batteries. Many others, including the famous
Stanley Steamer, were powered by burning coal, kerosene, or even
wood. But the greater power, efficiency, and convenience of the
early internal combustion engines - combined with the new mass
production techniques then being refined by
Henry Ford - condemned
other models to the scrap heap.
Related Topics:
Print this Article |