In Search Of Khan
by Charles Runnette
IN THE FOLLOWING WEEKS, everyone I
interviewed - from
Mongolia's prime minister to top Mongolian
specialists at universities around the globe to Japanese
archaeologists who had searched for Genghis's tomb in the 1990s -
poured buckets of cold water on the Genghis Khan Expedition's
claim. They each gave reasons why this "find" was nothing new and
most likely not even close to true. Shimpei Kato, the chief
Japanese archaeologist from a well-funded, high-tech expedition
that had visited the Oglogchiin site in 1996, told me, "Inside,
there was a relatively small Mongol-era grave, but, for sure, that
was not Genghis's tomb." And Christopher Atwood, PhD, a respected
Mongol from
Indiana University, actually laughed when I asked him
about it, saying, "The [Mongolian] government only approves digs if
they know the teams are looking [for the tomb] in the wrong place."
Thus the catch-22: No one - not even those in the government - is
absolutely positive of the grave's location. There is one spot that
many suspect is the tomb's location - a sacred mountain that's in
the Khentii district and off-limits to digging - but, in the end,
it's all speculation. Add to that fact the objections of Genghis's
descendants, the Mongols, to disturbing the remains of the founder
of their nation, and anyone searching for his elusive tomb has some
pretty big obstacles to overcome. Granted, the government realizes
that extending the permits to dig has some economic benefit to them
(e.g., bringing wealthy foreigners in, providing jobs for
translators); however, the people of Mongolia seem overwhelmingly
against disturbing their ancestor's remains. They don't want him
dug up - for the same reason that people in
Britain would object to
anyone rummaging around the tombs of the English kings in
Westminster Abbey. Genghis was their first king. He is the revered
ancestor of a living people.
Share Your Comments