Gioia | responding recruiter | The Financial Times | BusinessWeek
Rank Professionals
by
Jeff SiegelFinally, because the rankings penalize schools that don't make
significant changes in curricula or course offerings from survey to
survey, there is often a change-for-change's-sake philosophy. The
program's image becomes more important than actual, substantive
improvement, and MBA programs are completely overhauled every five
years whether they need it or not. "Are the rankings good or bad?
The short answer is both," says Gioia. "They do force the schools
to practice what they preach, but they also force schools to focus
on looking good, often at the expense of actually being good."
Which, not surprisingly, is the cause of much ill will among the
surveyors and the schools. The schools dislike being graded. They
dislike the way they're graded. They say the criteria for rankings
often change, the rankings emphasize the wrong criteria, and many
of the criteria are difficult to measure consistently.
For instance, the Journal survey asks about "chemistry" -
the responding recruiter's general like or dislike for the school.
The schools say a recruiter who's in a foul mood when he visits the
campus could trash a program, just because he had a bad
morning.
And is it possible to accurately assess the strength of a school's
faculty, who don't have test scores or grade point averages? The
Financial Times uses the number of PhDs on faculty, while
BusinessWeek tracks academic papers the faculty produces. Do
either mean anything in terms of providing a good education?
But what the schools especially dislike is all the work required to
be graded. Many of the surveys are labor intensive - the U.S.
News form is 10 to 12 pages, for instance. They require alumni
lists, test scores for incoming classes, and reams of other data.
Ute Frey, who coordinates responses for Haas, spends as much as
one-fifth of her time keeping track of the 16 surveys the school
participates in. Employees at other schools tell similar stories.
Says Dave Wilson, president and CEO of the Graduate Management
Admissions Council, an industry trade group, "That's the truly
dysfunctional dimension of all this. The time it takes to fill them
out just consumes the schools."
Related Topics:
Print this Article |