Back To The Future
by Lisa SonneNASA's human-transport plans are both futuristic and retro. John
Connolly was a deputy for the group that was given a 90-day
challenge in the summer of 2005 to create a new vehicle for getting
humans to the moon and to Mars. "We went back to documents that
were written in the 1960s, and we had a blue-ribbon group of folks
who walked on the moon to help," he says. "Subconsciously, we
really didn't want this to look like Apollo. We wanted it to look
like our generation's spacecraft, our trip to the moon. But after
three months of study, we learned that it's the physics that
basically shape what the vehicles look like." NASA administrator
Michael D. Griffin calls it "Apollo on steroids," referring to the
greater size and expanded capacities of the new vehicle.
Much of the system will rely on recycled shuttle engines and tanks.
A futuristic difference for a return to the moon may be the fuel
sources. "Eighty percent of the mass you land on the moon is your
rocket fuel to get home," says Connolly. "If you could manufacture
a fraction of that, there's an incredible economy."
Once on the moon, "there are chemical ways of cracking the oxygen
out of the moon dirt, which is called regolith. It's ground-up
rocks, really," Connolly says. "We've actually done experiments
using real lunar samples that the astronauts brought home in the
'60s, and we've proved in the laboratory that it can be done." He
is also optimistic about producing methane on Mars, which would
provide another good rocket-fuel component.
In theory, he says, "You could manufacture all the oxygen you'd
need to breathe, all the water you'd need to drink, and all the
fuel you'd need to get you home."
GOING UP?
Share Your Comments